“For sixty years the U.S. Supreme Court avoided trekking through the constitutional minefield accumulated around the long standing practice of police stopping and temporarily seizing people at civil traffic stops.” Its a nice day and you are traveling down the road in your automobile listening to one of your favorite tunes playing on your car stereo when, a frenzied display of psychotropic red and blue pulsating lights appear suddenly in your rearview mirror. Its a traffic cop! Like a warring bird of prey, he has swooped down upon you at lightning speed from out of nowhere and now he has you hopelessly locked firmly in his clutches. Millions of Americans each year, traveling upon our nations highways and streets, share in a similar unpleasant experience of getting a traffic ticket. In most states, minor traffic offenses are legally classified as infractions. Infractions are conside whey protein red legally to be petty offenses of the law and not a crime. The commission of an infraction is classified as a non-criminal act and, therefore, the infraction is a civil breach of the law. There is little civil about the experience of being chased down like a common criminal by an armed police officer and handed a civil traffic ticket. Most people find the experience to be very unnerving, if not downright frightening. The civil traffic stop is made infinitely more tyrannous in light of the fact that the victim of the cops assault committed no crime. The Fourth Amendment was designed to protect us against unreasonable search and seizures, requiring police to first have probable cause. Although probable cause was not defined by the Fourth Amendment, the Supreme Court has long held that probable cause must include a criminal act to warrant seizure, or arrest. In Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S.